SERP async tutorial
Open the related NovaDataHub page for deeper documentation, comparisons, or implementation guidance.
Async APIs are useful because they decouple request submission from result completion, but many integrations waste time by polling too aggressively or by treating every non-completed state as a failure. This guide shows how to build calmer, more reliable async job handling.
The submit call and the result call should live in separate parts of your workflow. Once you receive a jobId, move the work into a polling loop or worker instead of pretending the request is still synchronous.
A good polling client expects multiple intermediate states such as queued or running. Those states are not errors. They are part of the normal lifecycle and should delay the next check rather than trigger alarms.
Polling every second forever is rarely necessary. Increase the delay gradually, cap it at a practical maximum, and stop once the workflow moves into a terminal state.
while (status is "queued" or "running")
{
await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(delaySeconds), cancellationToken);
delaySeconds = Math.Min(delaySeconds + 2, 15);
}A sync timeout or a temporary long-running job should not automatically be classified as a data failure. Some workflows simply need to continue through the async polling endpoint after the initial wait ends.
Store submission time, first poll time, completion time, and any terminal error code. Those lifecycle markers make it much easier to explain slow jobs or find queue bottlenecks later.
Open the related NovaDataHub page for deeper documentation, comparisons, or implementation guidance.
Open the related NovaDataHub page for deeper documentation, comparisons, or implementation guidance.
Open the related NovaDataHub page for deeper documentation, comparisons, or implementation guidance.
Open the related NovaDataHub page for deeper documentation, comparisons, or implementation guidance.